The Silence Before “I Am”
Before any thought, before any personal story, even before the feeling of being someone, there is silence.
This silence is not emptiness in the ordinary sense. It is not a dead absence. It is a formless presence, without name, without effort. It is that which does not need to affirm itself in order to exist.
Nisargadatta Maharaj pointed to this by leading us to the sense “I Am.” First, we notice: I am. Before saying “I am this” or “I am that,” there is only the simple sense of presence. But even this presence still appears and disappears. It arises with consciousness and withdraws in deep sleep.
The Absolute is prior to that.
In A Course in Miracles, we find a different language, but a similar pointing: our true identity does not belong to the body, to time, or to the world of separation. The Son of God remains as God created him. What suffers is a learned image, a temporary belief, an identification with what we never truly were.
As long as we believe we are only a separate person, the world feels heavy. Everything must be defended: the body, the image, the opinion, the biography, the future. A tremendous amount of energy is spent maintaining the character.
But there are moments when something relaxes.
We do not need to destroy the ego violently. It is enough to see that it is only a construction. It is enough to return to the simple recognition: before every role, I am. And even more deeply, before the “I Am” itself, there remains That which was never born.
Forgiveness, in the sense of A Course in Miracles, is not moral superiority. It is the recognition that separation never had ultimate reality. Nisargadatta’s inquiry also brings us to this point: what changes cannot be what we are.
The body changes.
The mind changes.
Emotions change.
The world changes.
Consciousness itself appears and disappears.
But what we are, in essence, is not touched by these changes.
Perhaps peace is not something to be achieved. Perhaps it is simply what remains when we stop insisting on being what we never were.
In the end, it is not about believing in a doctrine. It is about looking, with honesty and silence, at what is already present before every belief.
Gassho.
Deixe uma resposta