The Amnesia of the Absolute
Nisargadatta invites us to remain with the simple sense of “I Am”, before any personal story appears. Jesus, in A Course in Miracles, calls us to remember that we are not the body, not guilt, and not the wounded character we believe ourselves to be.
In different languages, both point in the same direction: there has been a kind of forgetting. The Absolute, whole, free, and formless, seems to have fallen asleep in the dream of being someone separate. Then the “I” appears: a body, a biography, a past, a fear, a hope.
But this “I” was never the final truth.
Nisargadatta says: investigate who it is that suffers. The Course says: the Son of God only dreams that he has separated from the Father. One speaks of the consciousness “I Am”; the other speaks of the Christ within us. But both undo the same illusion: the belief that we are small, guilty, and alone.
The body will pass. The story will pass. Opinions, victories, and failures will also pass. But That which perceives all of this does not pass.
Perhaps spirituality is not about achieving something new, but about no longer defending an identity that was never real. We do not need to manufacture God. We do not need to become the Absolute. We only need to recognize that we never ceased to be That.
The amnesia ends when, for one instant, we stop insisting on the character.
And then silence remains.
Not an empty silence, but the living silence of Being.
Deixe uma resposta